Difference between revisions of "Defunding civil asset forfeiture"

From defundme.org
Jump to: navigation, search
m
 
Line 6: Line 6:
  
 
Sec. [XXX]. None of the funds made available under this or any other Act, or any prior Appropriations Act may be used to assist a state or local law enforcement agency to seize property pursuant to state law, nor shall any funds to take the seized asset and forfeit it under federal law.
 
Sec. [XXX]. None of the funds made available under this or any other Act, or any prior Appropriations Act may be used to assist a state or local law enforcement agency to seize property pursuant to state law, nor shall any funds to take the seized asset and forfeit it under federal law.
 +
 +
== Latest News ==
 +
<feed entries="20" url="https://feed.rssunify.com/5d76b0904b5f9/rss.xml" date="F j, Y">
 +
'''[{PERMALINK} {TITLE}]''' {DATE}
 +
</feed>
 +
----

Latest revision as of 20:06, 9 September 2019

AMENDMENT TO H.R. [XXXX], AS REPORTED

OFFERED BY [NAME OF MEMBER] OF [STATE]

At the end of the bill insert the following:

Sec. [XXX]. None of the funds made available under this or any other Act, or any prior Appropriations Act may be used to assist a state or local law enforcement agency to seize property pursuant to state law, nor shall any funds to take the seized asset and forfeit it under federal law.

Latest News

What are they thinking? July 17, 2017

For the government, on civil asset forfeiture, it’s all about the Benjamins April 12, 2017

Nebraska takes lead in eliminating civil asset forfeiture, Feds reinstate it April 27, 2016

States should follow Nebraska’s lead in eliminating civil asset forfeiture April 26, 2016

Civil asset forfeiture: It’s not just for drug dealers anymore July 29, 2015

21 things Congress could defund in Commerce, Science, and Justice June 3, 2015